Donna-P5

Photo Assignment Name: Ambiguous Space

Student Name: Donna Owen

Group Name: The Snapshots

PHOTO HERE

Title: Knight's Chain Mail

Self Evaluation: I took this photo in my yard. I applied extreme cropping and then I used a Photoshop filter to make it look distorted. I asked my son, who had not seen the original photo, to tell me what the new image looked like. He said it looked like chain mail that knights wore. I asked him to guess again, and he said it looked like moths. Since neither choice was correct, I figured that I had succeeded in constructing an ambiguous photograph. (The original photo is below my self-evaluation rubric.) This assignment was valuable to me because it helped me develop my “photographer’s eye.” I had to develop new perspectives on objects around me. I also learned about filtering features in Photoshop. I enjoyed applying the different filters to see the various results. || Strong || Adequate || Weak || || Does an outstanding job of communicating the concept. || Does an adequate job communicating the concept. || Does a poor job communicating the concept. || || Photograph uses composition principles very effectively. || Photograph does a good job using composition principles. || Photograph does a poor job using composition principles. || || Focus is a perfect match with the concept of the shot. || Focus is an adequate match with the concept of the shot. || Focus is a poor match with the concept of the shot. || || Shutter speed and aperture were perfectly chosen to match concept. || Shutter speed and aperture were adequately chosen to match concept. || Shutter speed and aperture were poorly chosen and do not match the concept. || || Excellent use of depth-of-field. || Adequate use of depth-of-field. || Poor use of depth-of-field. || || Title and tags were perfectly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are excellent with no mistakes. || Title and tags were adequately chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are good with only minor errors. || Title and tags were poorly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Contains multiple spelling errors or wrong word choices. || ** Instructor evaluates this section ** || || Excellent self-assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements. || Adequate self-assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor self-assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || || Excellent peer assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements. || Adequate peer assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor peer assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || || Peer comments exceed expectations. || Peer comments meet expectations. One or two comments might be missing. || Three or more peer comments were missing, incomplete or poorly written. || || ||  ||  || || >89% (45-50 pts.) || 80 – 89% (40 - 44 pts.) || <80% (<40 pts.) || Critique Comments:
 * Category
 * Concept
 * Composition
 * Focus
 * Technical Aspects
 * Depth of Field
 * Title/tags
 * ** This is the original photo. **
 * Self Critique
 * Peer Critique
 * Peer Comments
 * Total Points

Peer Critique Name: || Strong || Adequate || Weak || || Does an outstanding job of communicating the concept. || Does an adequate job communicating the concept. || Does a poor job communicating the concept. || || Photograph uses composition principles very effectively. || Photograph does a good job using composition principles. || Photograph does a poor job using composition principles. || || Focus is a perfect match with the concept of the shot. || Focus is an adequate match with the concept of the shot. || Focus is a poor match with the concept of the shot. || || Shutter speed and aperture were perfectly chosen to match concept. || Shutter speed and aperture were adequately chosen to match concept. || Shutter speed and aperture were poorly chosen and do not match the concept. || || Excellent use of depth-of-field. || Adequate use of depth-of-field. || Poor use of depth-of-field. || || Title and tags were perfectly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are excellent with no mistakes. || Title and tags were adequately chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are good with only minor errors. || Title and tags were poorly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Contains multiple spelling errors or wrong word choices. || || || Excellent self-assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements. || Adequate self-assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor self-assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || || Excellent peer assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements. || Adequate peer assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor peer assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || || Peer comments exceed expectations. || Peer comments meet expectations. One or two comments might be missing. || Three or more peer comments were missing, incomplete or poorly written. || || ||  ||  || || >89% (45-50 pts.) || 80 – 89% (40 - 44 pts.) || <80% (<40 pts.) || Critique Comments:
 * Category
 * Concept
 * Composition
 * Focus
 * Technical Aspects
 * Depth of Field
 * Title/tags
 * ** Instructor evaluates this section **
 * Self Critique
 * Peer Critique
 * Peer Comments
 * Total Points